mjj (flemmings) wrote,

O saeclum insapiens et infacetum!

I gather that editors don't edit anymore, but I thought that proof editors proofed. Evidently not. Rivers of London contained a couple of garbled sentences, but nothing like this howler from Jane and the Madness of Lord Byron. A clergyman is speaking:
...it is the death won without glory, the obscure and insignificant ending, that is most valued in the eyes of the Creator. We should not set ourselves up as rivals, I am sure, of that consummate sacrifice at Calgary.
Whether it was Spell Check or the proof reader that didn't know the word 'Calvary' I won't guess, but I observe that Firefox's spell checker does, and insists on a capital c.
Tags: reading, reading_11, rivers

  • (no subject)

    Because I come from the Before Times I have all sorts of stationery dating from the 70s and 80s or even before. It's usually envelopes, because I was…

  • (no subject)

    As ever, a crossword clue took me to Keats Ode to a Nightingale, which I'd somehow managed never to read even as I see it quoted all over the…

  • (no subject)

    Henh. If I were born today I'd have the same name- Madeleine- as the cousin who was born two? three? years before I was. That we're both named for…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded